Apparently, the BMC has initiated beautification projects worth Rs 1,700 crore, and the replacement of dividers is part of that plan. Some of the new ones are almost three feet tall though, which is why a few people have been complaining about how much harder it is to now get across.

The complaints struck me as unfair because they seemed to imply that our streets are supposed to prioritise the rights of pedestrians. Where did this ridiculous notion come from in a city as advanced and civilised as ours? It seemed to me as if pedestrians have already been given so much, and are now simply used to the idea of demanding more. What will they want next? Roads without paver blocks?

Poll

Who will win the Punjab Elections?

BJP 32.76%

AAP 43.10%

INC 24.14%

Submit

View All In Poll

Isn’t it true that a part of every footpath is already open to pedestrians? Yes, there are illegal constructions, the odd religious structure, some fast food stalls, and homeless people also sharing those spaces, but isn’t it unreasonable for us to expect the BMC or state government to remove these obstructions? When will they get around to doing the work they have been elected to do if all their time is spent on making life easy for pedestrians? We already spend way too much time on walking spaces and far too little on more coastal roads for vehicular traffic.

Also read: Public amenities must not be misused

Road dividers exist for a reason. They are to allow for the smooth flow of traffic, which is a lot more important than the need for people on one side of a street to get to the other. It’s why we already have impeccably maintained traffic stops where people can cross safely, and pedestrian overbridges every 10 kilometres or so. If pedestrians need to cross a street, why can’t they plan their walks in advance and cross a few kilometres before their destination?

I have no idea if the BMC will acquiesce and reduce the height of new road dividers, but maybe we should initiate a larger conversation about whether they need to be replaced with walls instead. If we have walls instead of dividers, it will compel pedestrians to either walk less or plan their trips better. The walls can also be used for advertising, generating crores for the BMC, and this money can then be used for more important projects such as renaming our railway stations or putting up a few more statues in our city to make it more Instagram-friendly.

We need to get over our obsession with ‘walking spaces’ and focus on the more important things our city needs. The BMC and state government are, quite rightly, prioritising the needs of vehicle owners over pedestrians because it recognises that a city with more cars automatically comes across as a more advanced place to live in. Walkers tend to dawdle aimlessly, and there is no place for that kind of activity in the model of Shanghai we intend to emulate soon.

For now, I suppose the road dividers will continue to exist, until some brave and intelligent politician puts together a committee of experts and insists on a more practical solution. If these new, taller road dividers are unavoidable, perhaps the BMC could consider adding monkey bars or other gymnasium equipment along these barriers to encourage people to exercise while they wait for traffic to clear. After all, this is an organisation known the world over for its brilliant ideas.

When he isn’t ranting about all things Mumbai, Lindsay Pereira can be almost sweet. He tweets @lindsaypereira
Send your feedback to mailbag@mid-day.com
The views expressed in this column are the individual’s and don’t represent those of the paper.