Tabassum’s show was an oral history of a contemporary medium not considered respectable, or worth studying until very recently. It was an industry that grew informally, through the energies of practitioners, rather than institutions. In continuity with that, movie people also led unconventional Indian lives. It is complex to record unconventional lives, work, worlds or relationships, because these are constantly unfolding, revealing new meanings of what life can be, outside an existing vocabulary. Perhaps their unprecedented nature can be apprehended best in conversations—open and fecund like gardens, unruly in places, manicured in others, blooming with insights, sowing seeds for later understanding. Tabassum’s interviews, which probed personal life—extra marital affairs, disappointments, encounters—as well as craft, success and working relationships, were an integrated record of this kind.

The barely-observed history of women in media reveals a different social history of media, women, and India. Tabassum’s career began with the nation in 1947. Born in a marriage between a freedom fighter and an Urdu journalist, she was named Tabassum by her Hindu father and Kiran Bala by her Muslim mother, expressing mutual love and respect. She told the story of her entry into films as a chance thing. Financial need may have driven it, but it also reveals the relationships between the world of letters and the world of cinema that was part of Bombay life—a fluid Hindustani world, which Phool Khile Hain inserted into Doordarshan’s imagination of nation.

Poll

Who will win the Punjab Elections?

BJP 32.84%

AAP 41.79%

INC 25.37%

Submit

View All In Poll

Tabassum pioneered a form taken forward by Rendezvous with Simi Garewal, with a significant difference. Her guests were not just A-list celebrities. She interviewed people as diverse as Jeevan and Dilip Kumar, Anand Bakshi and Prem Chopra. Where later shows aimed for exclusiveness, her show strove for polyglot inclusion, propelled by passion for the film industry, maybe even her marginalisation by it; a love as fulsome as the rose in her hair. 

What did the presence of such a figure on national television engender? The seeds of growth took root with her? That requires not just a different history—it requires a different way of telling history. Who is up for it? Who is up to it? Not super-sponsored KJo Koffee parlour, nor the arid cinephilia-as-listicle of Instagram, I think.

Paromita Vohra is an award-winning Mumbai-based filmmaker, writer and curator working with fiction and non-fiction. Reach her at paromita.vohra@mid-day.com