There should be free flow of traffic on roads, the apex court said.

The top court also impleads Haryana and Uttar Pradesh governments as parties in the case against blocking of roads due to farmers protest.

Poll

Who will win the Punjab Elections?

BJP 32.76%

AAP 43.10%

INC 24.14%

Submit

View All In Poll

The court made it clear that the larger issue on farm laws can be decided judicially, politically or administratively but the common man must not be inconvenienced.

"We clarified that we are not concerned with larger issue but only concerned with flow of traffic. Public streets should not be blocked," a Bench headed by Justice SK Kaul said.

The Bench emphasized that in its p previous judgements the apex court had made it clear that roads should not be blocked.

"We are not concerned how you (goverment) resolve this issue, whether politically, administratively or legally. But we have said this before, roads should not be blocked. It cannot create continuing inconvenience," the Bench said.

This is a single mother who has to face so many issues because of these blocked roads, said the Bench while posting the matter for hearing on April 19.

Earlier, the apex court had sought response from the Central government and Delhi Police Commissioner on the petition filed by the Noidaresident Monica Agarwal who claimed that her travel to Delhi was taking two hours instead of the normal 20 minutes.

She contended that despite the various directions passed by the apex court to keep the to and fro passage clear (the road), the same had still not happened.

Being a single parent who has some medical issues, Agarwaal said that it has become a nightmare to travel to Delhi. The plea said she stayed and worked in Noida, but since she had a marketing job she had to travel frequently to Delhi.

"It is her say that she is a single parent and also has some medical issues and it has become a nightmare to travel to Delhi where it is taking two hours instead of normal 20 minutes. She contends that despite the various directions passed by this Court to keep the to and fro passage clear (the roads), the same still does not happen. We did put to her if it is so, it is an administrative failure as the judicial view has already been propounded by us," the Bench had noted in its order.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever