The flat in Shivaji Park, Dadar where Cardozo was found dead

He added, “Preservation of muddemal [items used in crime] is important to us. The appellant trusted the investigating agency and now, due to lack of evidence, the perpetrator is at large. As the trial court found the evidence of independent witnesses insufficient for proving the last seen theory and the presence of the accused at the spot of incident, the forensic material in terms of blood stain clothes of the accused and his mobile tower location would have helped the trial court to have impeccable material. The evidentiary value of the forensic reports is very high, as these are scientific evidence admissible under the Indian Evidence Act. It’s surprising that no proper or serious attempts were made to gather the curial forensic evidence.”

Poll

Who will win the Punjab Elections?

BJP 32.86%

AAP 41.43%

INC 25.71%

Submit

View All In Poll

The case

Beleza Cardozo, 57, was found lying in a pool of blood in her second floor flat in Dadar West in November 2015. The main suspect in the case was a carpenter apart from a mason, both were employed by Cardozo. After investigation cops found the reason behind the crime to be robbery and arrested Manoj Verma, the carpenter, for murder.
  
Additional Sessions Judge KK Patil, in his 24-page order dated November 30, 2021, found no material evidence against the accused and stated that “Police have seized some blood-stained articles from the spot. Police also seized clothes of accused and blood-stained articles from the spot along with blood samples of the deceased but there is no evidence brought on record in the form of forensic evidence.”

Last seen theory 

As quoted by the Supreme Court in Ramanand v. State of Himachal Pradesh (1981), “Perfect proof is seldom to be had in this imperfect world and absolute certainty is a myth.” This makes way for circumstantial evidence and last seen theory as there is no direct evidence.

According to this theory, if a person is the last seen with the deceased just before his death or within a reasonable period of his death that no other person could have intervened in between them, then the presumption can be taken that he is the author of the crime. And thus, the burden of proof shifts on him to negate this fact and if he is not able to give a lucid and sufficient explanation about his innocence, he may be a suspect under eyes of law.