For Mayur Lookhar, every generation has adapted the monsters to their sensibilities. “The technology has come along in leaps and bounds. The stories though, were never the prime focus of the films,” the 41-year-old freelance writer emphasises. While he likes the spectacle, Lookhar believes the template is beginning to get repetitive. The global scale of the destruction can be entertaining, but it can get boring without a decent plot, he notes. Comparing it to the Jurassic Park sequels, he says, “I hope they do not return to the template of Godzilla vs King Kong as it can get predictable.” Despite the change in style, he admits that the previous film did a good job of adding novel elements into a universe of hidden monsters beneath the surface of the earth. “I like the idea of contemporising these legends for a new generation, but they should not be completely alienated from their original,” he says. All said and done, he prefers to keep the anti-hero soul of the monsters alive. “It made them appear human in a different way, and the film should keep that aspect intact,” Lookhar concludes.

Poll

Who will win the Punjab Elections?

BJP 32.76%

AAP 43.10%

INC 24.14%

Submit

View All In Poll

The rise of new monster species

Akash Purswani clarifies that this version of King Kong and Godzilla belong to a different ‘monster-verse’. “They are versions of Universal’s Monster-verse, rather than a continuation of the King Kong from 2005,” the 31-year-old assistant professor shares. The draw of the films lies in the explosive destruction, says Purswani. While it is all about the spectacle, he reasons that the sequel cannot be about the clash. “I think it will be about a new variant. The previous film had a sub-plot on experimentation and a realm of monsters,” he points out. Of course he thinks that there will be an human antagonist leading the experimentation. “I hope they bring in a mecha-godzilla to up the ante,” Purswani says expectantly.