Sam Miller

Miller’s book charts an ambitious course, starting with the long-extinct ‘lobsterpedes’, creatures that because of their symbolic passage from the ocean to the land about 530 million years ago, could be effectively considered the first migrants. It’s a move so significant that Miller calls it “the lobster equivalent of humans landing on the moon”. From the early travels of the Yaghan who journeyed to the southernmost tip of South America, the Bible which “can be read as a migration handbook” and Alexander the Great who spent most of his adult life on the move, to the origins of the Aryans, the Viking migration, Columbus “whose Atlantic wanderings would ultimately lead to possibly the greatest of all modern human migrations”, the North American slave trade and migration around the South China Sea which was at the heart of what became known as the ‘Maritime Silk Road’, several migratory narratives are examined. The book however stops short of engaging with narratives, patterns and issues around modern migration. “It was a deliberate decision – taken after much thought,” Miller explains. “Modern migration has become such an explosively toxic issue…  In most countries people calm down, and talk less emotively, when the discussion is about migration in the past.”

Poll

Who will win the Punjab Elections?

BJP 32.86%

AAP 41.43%

INC 25.71%

Submit

View All In Poll

Among several topical discussions in the book is one about the complex relationship between human mobility and contagious disease and how migrants suffer disproportionately during pandemics, calling to mind the much-politicised plight of Indian migrant workers back in 2021. Miller points out that rather than economic migrants or refugees, history shows that it is those trying to avoid getting infected by fleeing who end up spreading contagion. Moreover, “encouraging people to return—in an unplanned manner—to their home villages at the time of a pandemic is a certain way of spreading the virus”.

Miller also writes about how in India where he spent over a decade, migration plays an important role in the struggle over the identity of modern India and the disagreements that are there about that identity. “I used to joke that in India you could make a reasonably reliable prediction of someone’s political views by asking them about migration and the Indus Valley Civilisation. Only in India could you make such a prediction based on such ancient history,” he says. At the same time, he admits that migration is enormously complex in the context of the country. “I would argue that India is, in many but not all circumstances, better considered a continent, rather than just a country. This is particularly relevant to internal migration because India is comparable in scale and population and variety and languages and ‘regional’ identities to Europe, rather than, say, Britain or France. And this applies strongly to the subject of India’s migration history which should be seen through a continental lens.” While India has recently been aping western concepts of what a country should be, other countries, he says, could learn from how it, at least until recently, has been a place where diversity could thrive, “always imperfectly, but still in a more impressive manner than in many other parts of the world.”